|
|
The Labor Court was organized by Decree ,, of It was preceded by the creation of the National Labor Council in The Getúlio Vargas government, implemented by the Revolution, contributed to the creation of bodies that promote labor rights in our country. Thus, on he created the Ministry of Labor, Industry and Commerce, as one of his first initiatives. Labor law, at its inception, underwent several transformations, being expanded, organized and regulated. This process culminated in the installation of the Labor Court on The Consolidation of Labor Laws was approved by Decree-Law ,, dated which came into force on November of that year. Furthermore, during the Getúlio Vargas government, several labor rights emerged; Among them, the minimum wage, the -hour working week, the professional card and paid holidays. The contribution of Labor Justice to promoting social justice, which is a prerequisite for true peace, is indisputable. Through its actions, economic development is combined with worker protection, which contributes to balancing the interests of production factors, resulting in the common good. There is, among less informed people, the impression that the Labor Court bodies, in their decisions, protect the worker. This is not true.
It turns out that they apply Greece Phone Number protectionist legislation for workers, who are the weakest party in the work relationship, aiming at the aforementioned balance of interests between the parties and, thus, promoting social peace. To resolve disputes arising in the relationship between capital and labor, the Labor Court bodies give priority to the agreement. So much so that, in the first instance, they called themselves, until Constitutional Amendment Conciliation and Judgment Boards. In general, conciliation is the most appropriate solution to achieve the objective of judicial provision: the satisfaction of fair interests, pacifying the litigants. Now, in conciliation, it is the parties themselves who decide, observing the legal requirements for the validity of the expression of will, that is, avoiding defects in consent. The occurrence, on the part of some employees, of abuse in the exercise of the right to action is undeniable, which may even characterize litigation in bad faith. However, this behavior, once characterized, was always rejected by the Labor Court bodies. Now, it can result in a financial burden for the worker, once he succumbs in the labor action process, according to the provisions of article -A, caput and § , of the CLT, included by Law , (labor reform). Labor judiciary bodies are responsible for resolving a large number of disputes arising from labor relations, which is their material competence.
This result is obtained through the ratification of agreements or sentences.The government's allegations that the discussion on "the Brazil case" was premature and in view of the established controversy over whether or not the country had submitted legislative changes to the participation of workers' unions, the ILO granted a deadline for the Brazil to provide detailed information on the "Labor Reform" . Despite the above, at the time the government officially released the untrue information that the ILO recognized that the Brazilian "Labor Reform" complies with international labor conventions [] , which was contradicted by workers' unions and by Anamatra — National Association of Labor Court Magistrates [] . Faced with the controversy, sought to clarify the facts, the ILO confirmed that it only requested new clarifications and that the "Brazil case" would still be assessed [] . In , the matter was once again included in discussions at the th International Labor Conference, in a very similar situation to the previous year. The country continued to be on the short list and, after the government's statement, a new deadline was granted for Brazil to present complete information.
|
|
發表於 16:29:03